Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
The Hennepin County Energy Recovery Center (HERC) incinerator is a public health crisis. When a thousand tons of trash a day are burned in downtown Minneapolis, residents breathe the consequences. Lead emissions damage our brains and organs. Minneapolis children develop asthma at some of the highest rates in our state. PFAS chemicals are heated, but not destroyed, spreading airborne “forever chemical” toxins.
That’s why the Minneapolis City Council is calling for its closure by the end of 2027.
Independent science has shown that the HERC contributes to shortened life spans and disease. These risks are borne by communities that already face far more than their share of health burdens.
As the city resolution was debated, powerful arguments came forward — during testimony, council deliberations and in these pages. It’s worthwhile to review the facts: We agree that landfills, both closed and operating, are a chronic problem. While reducing our dependence on landfilling has been a longstanding state goal, we’ve made startlingly little progress in three-plus decades since passage of the Landfill Abatement Act, which was intended to reduce landfilling in the metro area. Hennepin County’s target recycling rate for 2030 is 75%. We’re still at around 40%. Important strides have been made, including steps forward on organics composting and packaging reduction as well as technology that captures methane to mitigate landfills’ contribution to climate change. But we have a long way to go.
Of these two problems, one has an immediate solution: We can shut the HERC down. Many jurisdictions in the U.S. operate solid waste systems without incineration. And continuing in perpetuity to truck our trash to downtown Minneapolis, douse it with fossil (“natural”) gas and set it alight is not a climate solution. The question is not will we close the HERC, rather, it’s when.
Some HERC defenders advocate for delay by arguing that incineration is better than landfills. First, their information is outdated and flawed, completely ignoring health impacts and not factoring in reductions in organic waste going to landfills, which is the cause of methane release. This is why the EPA is currently reviewing its waste hierarchy. Second, the dichotomy is false: Two-thirds of HERC waste coming from Minneapolis can be recycled or composted. And after incineration, about 25% of the original tonnage remains in the form of ash, which typically contains numerous toxic elements (like lead, cadmium, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, etc.) and other contaminants (dioxins, furans, chloride, acids, etc.). This ash is then trucked to another landfill in Rosemount — about 250 tons each day. After kicking the can on landfill abatement for decades and wasting tens of millions of dollars on HERC each year — putting the county into $37-million-plus in debt for HERC repairs — closing the HERC is an opportunity to seriously invest in a zero-waste future.
