Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of material from 11 contributing columnists, along with other commentary online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
I don’t like your favorite tree. Look, it’s nothing personal. You just have bad taste. The ideal tree, obviously, is one that facilitates climbing. It has thick branches stretching out long and low to the ground. The ideal tree is also tall, because it’s fun to scramble up high, and it has enough branches to bring your friends up behind you. All of this means the ideal tree, of course, is a pine.
Now you may disagree. Perhaps you are one of the many people who erroneously believe falling pine needles kill grass by making the soil too acidic. (If the grass is dead under a pine, the real culprit is likely those luxuriant branches that are a touch too effective at creating shelter against both sun and rain.) Or maybe you’re just a weirdo who has a problem with sap.
But whatever the reason, you’re wrong. And I’m right. But I am not without humility. I know everyone loves their favorite tree and could praise it and defend it just as faithfully and earnestly as I do my own. Each person’s favorite tree is the best — to them. Even the cottonwood fans have honest hearts. “I love how their leaves rustle in the wind,” said Danielle Schumerth, forestry outreach coordinator for the Minneapolis parks department. “I understand it can be an issue for a lot of people, but I even love seeing the cotton fly. Like it’s snowing in summertime.”
Yes, trees are necessary, solid, respectable and sometimes even beloved. But they are not free from controversy. And in the city, they don’t just happen to grow by luck or by chance. Every tree planted in an urban forest represents a choice that somebody made, a goal they had in mind, or a feature they liked and wanted to have around. When those trees are watered, trimmed and cared for … those actions are also steeped in deliberate choices and specific desires. And every decision has the potential to be a hot take.
That’s because all those individual choices and desires — the trees we want, and what we want from them — are frequently in conflict. Even something as simple as shade can be a sticking point. Construction workers and city arborists often butt heads over this, Schumerth told me, when the workers want to park equipment under a tree’s canopy and lean their tools against its trunk. The benefit to the crew is obvious — a shady spot on a hot summer day. But the arborists have to constantly be the buzzkill because their primary concern is making sure the dirt around the tree’s base doesn’t become so compacted that the roots beneath starve to death.
The tensions about trees — and how best to use them — become even more fraught when you have to set public policy somewhere between a trunk and a hard place. Everybody has an opinion. Only one group gets to set the rules.