Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Housing and education are intrinsically linked — a connection that while opens doors for some, closes them for others.
For most students in Minnesota and across the country, where you live determines where you go to school. Even in an open-enrollment state like ours, approximately 90% of students attend schools in their local community. The quality of schools and districts consistently rank as a top priority for families when deciding where to live, shaping housing markets and community demographics.
This connection between housing and education forms a nearly perfect feedback loop. Local property taxes, drawn from home values, provide one of the most stable sources of school funding, contributing about 20% of a district’s revenue annually in Minnesota. In turn, school performance drives home values higher, creating a cycle where wealthier neighborhoods have access to better-funded schools. The median value of homes near high-performing elementary schools is approximately four times greater than those near lower-performing schools, according to a national study.
However, families facing housing insecurity are often left out of this cycle entirely as they grapple with frequent moves and disrupted schooling. For these families, the link between housing and education becomes a trap, reinforcing inequity and limiting opportunities for upward mobility.
While the impact on children and families is widely recognized, another group deeply affected by this often goes overlooked: teachers.
A recent report by the National Council on Teacher Quality revealed that it takes the average teacher in the Twin Cities 10 to 15 years to save for a down payment on a median-priced home. Not surprisingly, teachers are less likely to own homes compared to similarly educated professionals, further underscoring the barriers they face in attaining stability and financial freedom.