Since becoming a columnist two months ago, I keep getting variations of this question: "Who's going to live in all the apartments now being built in the Twin Cities?"
I respond with an explanation about the longtime shortage of apartments here, the result of 30 years or so of not enough construction.
And I mention that perceptions tend to be quite localized. These days, there's more apartment building in the suburbs than in Minneapolis and St. Paul, a reversal from what was happening in the years just before the pandemic.
Jim Buchta, our lead real estate reporter, tells me he gets this question all the time, too. And so does Anne Behrendt, chief executive of Doran Cos., the Bloomington-based developer. "For many people, it seems like, wow, we're building a lot of housing," she said.
Behrendt said she thinks there is currently a healthy amount of apartment building in the Twin Cities. Indeed, apartments here remain more affordable than the national average and the occupancy rate is right around 95%, indicating a balanced market.
There has been some success recently building so-called income-restricted or affordable apartments. But, because new construction is expensive, these affordable options will always be in short supply relative to market-rate apartments.
Meanwhile, in St. Paul, where voters passed a rent control resolution in 2020, apartment construction has virtually stopped. As a result, the city will be in short supply for years. Minneapolis voters that year told their City Council to explore rent control, but the council has wisely steered clear.
In 2018, the Itasca Project, the group formed by CEOs of big local companies, outlined several goals to address fears that the Twin Cities housing market would become too expensive. Its housing affordability model, which the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis portrays in a handy dashboard on its website, says the Twin Cities needs 18,000 new housing units each year.