Citing a lack of legal standing, the Minnesota Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit brought by a Minneapolis homeowner who alleged her property taxes were being illegally used by Minneapolis Public Schools because of a provision in its teachers contract which included protections for minority educators.
Judicial Watch, an education foundation based in Washington, D.C., brought the “complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief” on behalf of Deborah Jane Clapp in Hennepin County District Court in 2022, which argued that a provision in the 2021-2023 contract between Minneapolis Public Schools and the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers Local 59 was unconstitutional.
The provision, Article 15 in the contract which is still in effect, made teachers from “underrepresented” populations exempt from seniority-based layoffs and reassignments and also prioritized them for reinstatements over teachers with more seniority who were not a member of minority populations. The suit listed Rochelle Cox, the former interim superintendent of Minneapolis Public Schools, the district and the Minneapolis school board as defendants. It sought to declare Article 15 and any use of public funds implementing it as illegal.
The Supreme Court opinion, written by Justice Karl Procaccini, deals strictly with the question of when a taxpayer has a legal standing to challenge governmental action. The Supreme Court recently looked at the same issue in a case involving the Minnesota Voters Alliance, which challenged a new state law that restored voting rights to felons. In that decision, the court ruled you do not have the right to sue simply because you disagree with the way taxpayer money is being used by a government entity.
A statement from the school district said, “Minneapolis Public Schools is pleased with the court’s decision in this matter and we thank the partners who joined us in the appeal.”
Marcia Howard, president of the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers and 26-year district veteran, said the contract language was about equality in their ranks and the benefit of students in Minneapolis schools.
“We worked so hard, that negotiating team, to put that language on the book so that underrepresented members could be safe from layoffs,” Howard said. “Frankly, we have been so proud to work shoulder-to-shoulder with the school district to defend that language from attacks by national MAGA groups like Judicial Watch.”
In a statement, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton called the ruling “beyond the pale.”