DULUTH – A candidate running for a rare opening in northeast Minnesota’s Sixth Judicial District allegedly pushed back on a victim advocate position — which was to be paid for with grants — and work on a domestic violence response program when he led Duluth’s City Attorney’s Office.
A former colleague and the head of a Minnesota crime nonprofit that helped administer the grant said Gunnar Johnson told them he didn’t want to add another person to the office in 2018 when federal money was available to fill the role.
Johnson said in a recent Duluth News Tribune story that he had pushed city prosecutors for better domestic violence outcomes as city attorney. And in a 2018 story in the same newspaper, he said the work of the victim advocate, who was ultimately hired, had made “a huge difference.”
However, Minnesota Alliance on Crime executive director Bobbi Holtberg said this week that when she reached out to Johnson by phone seven years ago to explain the position and the likelihood the city would be awarded funding, he wasn’t interested.
“He kind of cut me off and said, ‘we’re fine. We use administrative staff; I’m not interested in having one more person or thing to manage,’” Holtberg said, noting he was “dismissive and condescending.”
Victim advocates typically communicate with victims of crime — largely domestic violence — and guide them through the legal process. At the time, it had been several years since the City Attorney’s Office had someone in that role. Holtberg said it was unusual for a city the size of Duluth, typically with high domestic violence caseloads, to be without one, especially considering it is where the Duluth Model, an internationally known victim-centered method for domestic assault response, originated.
A News Tribune review of more than 400 completed misdemeanor domestic assault cases between 2015 and 2017 showed nearly two-thirds of the people the city prosecuted for that crime received unsupervised probation, if any punishment at all.
Johnson served as city attorney for 12 years before his 2020 resignation amid an investigation into his treatment of employees that found he “made inappropriate statements” at work, including that he would “work you like sled dogs until someone can’t make it any further and then we will move on.”