The Minnesota Department of Education recently released the latest round of student testing results. Overall, math and reading scores on the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs) remained flat, as they have for the past few years. In the 2015-16 school year, 59 percent of students were at grade level in math and 60 percent were at grade level in reading.
The state's response to the flat performance was troubling. According to the St. Paul Pioneer Press, the Education Department suggested that "the state may never boost the academic performance of students of color without first addressing the outside factors that hold children back in school."
This is a cop-out, essentially suggesting that schools are powerless to educate students who are economically disadvantaged or who face other challenges outside of school. Furthermore, it suggests that these students cannot be helped.
It's a defeatist mind-set that absolves our education system of responsibility to educate. It's also contrary to the experience of many schools that are successfully educating low-income students and students of color.
Minnesota's math, reading and science tests give families, educators, policymakers, and the public critical and objective information on how well students are progressing on our state's standards. In fact, the MCAs are the only tests that are specifically aligned to our state's rigorous academic standards.
But tests provide more than mere measurement. Since they are aligned to the state's academic standards, the tests also provide a road map to postsecondary success. In fact, students who meet benchmarks on the state's high school reading and math MCAs will soon be automatically exempt from remedial courses at Minnesota State (formerly MnSCU) colleges and universities. Currently, 25 percent of high school graduates end up taking postsecondary remedial courses to learn things they should have learned in the K-12 system, a wasteful cost to those students as well as their schools.
In short, the state's tests and academic standards provide a road map to students and educators alike. Without these tools, they are flying blind, and what students are taught in one school can differ significantly from what's taught in another school.
However, whatever one's interpretation may be of these test results, we should all be able to agree that measuring student knowledge and achievement is a critical part of a quality education. After all, you can't improve what you don't measure.