The Rolling Stones without Bill Wyman. Sure. Without Brian Jones. OK. Then without Mick Taylor. Alright.
But the Stones without Charlie Watts? Nope. No way.
When it came to image and personality, Watts, who died Tuesday at age 80, was an outlier. An elegant, refined gentleman among street fighting men. A bespoke Savile Row suit among hip Carnaby Street rags and ruffles. A longtime married man among serial womanizers.
I know it's only rock 'n' roll, and we like it. We like the Stones because of Mick Jagger's moves and mouth, Keith Richards' licks and swagger, and Watts' solid, in-the-pocket timekeeping. The drummer played behind the beat, creating a groove that made us dance with joy and abandon decade after decade.
Watts was the glue that held the Stones together. He laid down shuffles and swings with jazzy patterns, allowing the music to breathe, making room for other players. Subtle and steady, he viewed himself as an accompanist. No drum solos, no big drum kits.
Like Ringo Starr with the Beatles, Watts was an efficient and highly effective drummer, an unflashy sideman among flamboyant stars yet a star in his own right.
The Stones knew how essential Watts was to their sound. Just listen to the languid shuffle intro on "Let It Bleed," the jazzy chaos on "19th Nervous Breakdown," the crisp pocket on "Rocks Off," oh we could go through the entire Stones catalog.
As Richards put it in a 1979 interview: "Everybody thinks Mick and Keith are the Rolling Stones. If Charlie wasn't doing what he's doing on drums, that wouldn't be true at all. You'd find out that Charlie Watts is the Stones."