Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of commentary online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Economic and employment data told a statistical story of the Great Depression. But the human story was understood visually through visceral images like “Migrant Mother,” Dorothea Lange’s era-defining photograph of a destitute, desperate farmworker and her children huddled in a California camp after the failure of the pea crop.
The Great Recession didn’t yield such similar images — mostly photos of abandoned Arizona, Florida or California condominiums, or “The Big Short,” the sublime film about subprime mortgages plunging the country into a deep recession that nearly spun into a global depression — a specter that led then President George W. Bush to say that if Congress didn’t cooperate on emergency legislation “this sucker could go down.”
The Great Depression’s social and economic shock led to temporary programs like the WPA and CCC as well as enduring entities like the FDIC and SEC, among other alphabet-soup Washington and Wall Street institutions.
The Great Recession spurred one significant equivalent: The CFPB, or Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which “was created after excessive risk-taking by financial companies, many of whom were not supervised by a federal regulator, crashed our economy,” Adam Rust, director of financial services for the Consumer Federation of America, said in a statement.
In a follow-up interview, Rust said that “first, they shouldn’t shutter it because it’s illegal,” referring to its creation by Congress, not the White House. He elaborated that the bureau is “dedicated to consumers, which is unlike any banking agency. When an older person is scammed, when a service member falls prey to a predatory loan, when you can’t get resolution on your mortgage bill or your student-loan account, it’s the CFPB that steps in.”
In fact, the bureau says it’s stepped in to claw back nearly $21 billion on behalf of wronged consumers. But the agency has long been fought by financial institutions. And now, by the Trump administration. Which, in action akin to the lightning (and likely illegal) dismantling of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), has frozen the bureau’s work by actions from the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), as well as the Office of Management and Budget, whose recently confirmed leader, Russell Vought, was one of the architects of “Project 2025,” the controversial governing blueprint President Donald Trump disavowed on the campaign trail but seems to now be implementing from the White House.