Q: My department has a strategic staff position opening, and a friend of mine, "Joe," recommended his former colleague "Eleanor" for the position. After meeting with her, I was pleased to recommend her, as her qualifications are just right and she's kept her knowledge up to date while being out of the workforce with family. But … she interviewed very poorly. Do I put my credibility on the line to help her get a second hearing, or just let it go, despite the pressure from Joe to help?
Grace, 39, senior communications manager
A: Sorting out your various commitments in this scenario will help you clarify the best way to proceed.
Think of it in terms of layers of importance. Your most important commitment is to the needs of your company. If you believe Eleanor is the right person for the job based on that lens, that can drive some business-focused actions on your part. More on that shortly.
For Joe and Eleanor, you have the commitments of professionalism and respect. You are obligated to communicate promptly and honestly, but this doesn't create a requirement of support at all costs. They have requirements, too, related to respecting your boundaries.
With this in mind, take a fresh look at your department's needs. What are the most important requirements and how hard is it to find qualified candidates? If you have five equally compelling candidates, it may be harder to make a case for a second look.
Then find out what "interviewing poorly" meant. If this was her first interview with anyone since returning to the workforce, it could have been lack of preparation and/or nerves. This is on her, and I would strongly recommend that she work on that before her next interviews.
If it was related to the substance of her knowledge and skills, line up their feedback against your impressions to understand the disconnect.