There is a young fan in a hospital in New York, recovering from injuries suffered when a foul ball traveling at 105 miles per hour struck her in the face Wednesday during a game between the Twins and Yankees.
Players in that game were visibly shaken, the Twins' Brian Dozier and the Yankees' Matt Holiday were at the point of tears, as the game was halted while the fan was attended to.
Yankees officials now vow to take a hard look at extending the protective netting behind home plate. The Reds, Padres, Rockies and Mariners since have announced plans to extend protective netting at their stadiums.
It's commendable that teams have acted to limit the chances of a potential life-changing event occurring at their parks. The issue here is that it's reactive. Why does someone have to suffer before change is enacted? Foul balls and flying bats have been potential disasters for decades.
Why won't Commissioner Rob Manfred upgrade his nearly two-year old ''recommendation'' of extra netting to a full-fledged demand?
The National Hockey League acted swiftly in 2002 when 13-year old Brittanie Cecil died two days after being struck in the temple by a deflected puck during a game in Columbus. The NHL installed netting in the areas behind each goal. And never looked back.
MLB teams have protective netting that, in most parks, extends from behind home plate to the nearest end of each dugout. According to the Washington Post, the number of ballparks with extended netting will be at 14, once the aforementioned teams expand theirs.
The Twins were one of the first to extend netting to the far end of each dugout, announcing their intentions about a month after Manfred made the recommendation in the fall of 2015.