Recounting an election isn't cheap. But as Minnesota begins that process Monday in the governor's race between DFLer Mark Dayton and Republican Tom Emmer, a study of previous recounts shows it did a better job than a similar state in curtailing costs.
The Pew Center on the States recently compared the costs of recounting the 2008 U.S. Senate race in Minnesota with recounting the 2004 governor's race in Washington.
Minnesotans cast 2.92 million ballots in the Senate election between Republican Norm Coleman and Democrat Al Franken. Washington voters cast 2.88 million ballots in the governor's race between Democrat Christine Gregoire and Republican Dino Rossi.
Turns out Washington spent nearly $900,000 and Minnesota spent $460,000 -- 30 cents per ballot compared to 15 cents -- to conduct manual recounts. Washington's total costs rose to nearly $1.2 million to include a separate machine recount, which was mandated in that state but not in Minnesota.
Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie capped state reimbursement to counties at 3 cents per recounted ballot, while Washington counties operated without similar limits.
Washington wrestled with provisional ballots, used when a voter's eligibility is questioned, which weren't an issue in Minnesota. Minnesota's costs also were kept lower because challenged ballots were sent to the state Canvassing Board, "streamlining the dispute resolution process," Pew wrote. "In Washington...counties had to manage the time-consuming and contentious process of resolving disputed ballots individually."
But a bigger share of the burden fell on counties in Minnesota. The state reimbursed only 20 percent of county recount costs, while Washington reimbursed 40 percent.
PAT DOYLE