Is David Guy McKay an angry activist who decided to make firebombs to strike police who derailed his plans to disrupt the Republican National Convention?
Or is he the victim of entrapment, a naive follower goaded into more radical action by a government informant bent on getting someone arrested?
Those were the substance of the opening statements Monday on the first day of the federal trial for McKay, 22, of Austin, Texas. The trial is expected to last all week.
The trial has garnered national attention, not so much for what McKay allegedly did or didn't do. No explosives were ever used. Rather, the intrigue and legal debate arise from the actions of activist-turned-informant, Brandon Darby, 32.
At the heart of the case -- and what the jury must determine -- is whether Darby himself planted the seeds for destruction in the minds of McKay and his friend, Bradley Crowder, 23. Or whether he, as Darby and federal officials say, turned government mole when protesters' plans for the convention became too violent. Crowder pleaded guilty Jan. 8.
"At no time did he encourage, incite or persuade them to do anything," Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Paulsen told the jury of Darby. "He did not want to see people get hurt at the Republican National Convention."
But Jeff DeGree, McKay's attorney, offered a different version of events.
"A government informant entrapped David McKay," he said.