Advertisement

Why does the Stone Arch Bridge cross the Mississippi at such an odd angle?

November 2, 2019 at 6:39PM
June 3, 1954 Great Northern Railway's first Empire Builder, which entered service in 1929, is shown on the Stone Arch Bridge crossing the Mississippi river in Minneapolis. Locomotive and bridge are historic too. No. 2517 won the "Marathon" appearing on its tender, in 1925 by making a fast 3,600-mile round trip between Seattle and St. Paul without requiring mechanical attention. It powered a special silk train eastbound and Great Northern's Fast Mail westbound.The bridge, completed in 1883, is th
Great Northern Railway’s first Empire Builder is shown on the Stone Arch Bridge in Minneapolis on June 3, 1954. (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

Minneapolis was a tiny burg when the Stone Arch Bridge brought grandeur and elegance to the city's industrial riverfront. Even amid a modern-day metropolis, the bridge remains one of the area's most eye-catching landmarks.

Older than most historic buildings still standing in the Twin Cities, the 136-year-old bridge has long been Minneapolis' de facto welcome mat. Before it was a hot spot for sightseeing and wedding photos, railroad passengers peered from their windows down at St. Anthony Falls as their trains followed the bridge's gentle curve into downtown.

That bridge's diagonal orientation was on the mind of a Star Tribune reader who wanted to know why it cuts across the Mississippi River at such a peculiar angle. The question was submitted to Curious Minnesota, our community-driven reporting project fueled by questions from inquisitive readers.

The answer has more to do with logistics than aesthetics.

Minneapolis had a railroad problem in the 1880s. Apart from a rickety suspension bridge, there was no efficient method of bringing goods and passengers into downtown Minneapolis from key rail tracks on the east side of the river. So city leaders called upon James J. Hill, who owned the main rail connection between Minneapolis and St. Paul, to develop a solution.

Their goal was to eventually bring trains into a Union Depot that would be erected near the intersection of Nicollet and Hennepin avenues. Hill initially considered taking a more direct route with a new bridge across Nicollet Island, according to an authoritative 1987 history of the bridge published in Hennepin History Magazine.

But his engineer, Col. Charles C. Smith, was wary of disrupting the sandstone river­bed above the falls — which was already eroding — and perhaps fundamentally altering the water power fueling the city's industry. A catastrophic collapse caused by the construction of a tunnel a dozen years earlier was still fresh in people's minds, according to the magazine. They were also worried about the bridge's pillars creating ice and logjams.

Instead they decided to play it safe and build the bridge below the falls, just upstream from where Hill's tracks ended (near today's Dinkytown). It would cross at a diagonal — with a 6-degree curve at one end — so trains could easily travel into the riverside rail yards on their way to and from the proposed depot.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Speed was an important factor. Most railroad bridges of the day were fragile timber structures that trains had to traverse slowly, said Ray Lowry, a Worthington history teacher who wrote the 1987 article.

"Hill didn't want that," Lowry said. "He wanted something that was permanent, something that those trains could steam over at full speed."

The depot opened in 1885. It eventually became so popular that a new depot was required, prompting the construction of the Great Northern Depot in 1914, according to Lowry's history. That building was demolished in 1978.

Eric Roper • 612-673-1732

about the writer

about the writer

Eric Roper

Curious Minnesota Editor

Eric Roper oversees Curious Minnesota, the Minnesota Star Tribune's community reporting project fueled by great reader questions. He also hosts the Curious Minnesota podcast.

See Moreicon

More from Minnesota Star Tribune

See More
In this photo taken Monday, March 6, 2017, in San Francisco, released confidential files by The University of California of a sexual misconduct case, like this one against UC Santa Cruz Latin Studies professor Hector Perla is shown. Perla was accused of raping a student during a wine-tasting outing in June 2015. Some of the files are so heavily redacted that on many pages no words are visible. Perla is one of 113 UC employees found to have violated the system's sexual misconduct policies in rece

We respect the desire of some tipsters to remain anonymous, and have put in place ways to contact reporters and editors to ensure the communication will be private and secure.

card image
Advertisement
Advertisement

To leave a comment, .

Advertisement