A incongruous white Metro Transit van toddled carefully along the Cedar Lake bike trail earlier this week, causing some bewilderment among the path's bikers and joggers.
A group of transit planners, elected officials and reporters tumbled out of the van, and were soon peering at the horizon where a 10-foot concrete wall will be built to separate freight trains from the proposed $1.9 billion Southwest light-rail line.
The $20 million crash wall, or "corridor protection barrier" in technical parlance, has drawn fresh criticism — and cost — to an already beleaguered project that will link downtown Minneapolis to Eden Prairie.
The 1.4-mile stretch of the route in Minneapolis where the wall would be built is controlled by BNSF Railway and located between the planned Royalston Avenue/Farmers Market and Bryn Mawr stations. Much of the route winds through an industrial underside of the city, an area that has been eyed for transit-related development for at least a decade as the Southwest project inched forward.
The wall was a late addition to the project, part of a broader $58.5 million agreement between the Met Council and BNSF and Twin Cities & Western Railroad that is still not complete. The council approved it during a three-day stretch last month with little public input — prompting outcry from Minneapolis officials.
BNSF says it needs the wall for safety reasons, "based on our experience with light rail operating next to us." Similar transit barriers have cropped up elsewhere in Maryland, California and Denver at the behest of powerful rail companies. Yet other railroads sharing part of the Southwest corridor — Twin Cities & Western and Canadian Pacific Railway — required no such walls.
The Met Council will conduct an environmental review that is required because the wall is located in the Great Northern Railway Historic District, which stretches to North Dakota. Ultimately, the Federal Transit Administration will determine this December whether more study is needed — or not.
But that doesn't appease state lawmakers from Minneapolis who think a more thorough environmental review is needed before any concrete is poured.