Senate Republicans made a monumental call of immediate and long-term consequence Friday when they voted not to allow any new witnesses in President Donald Trump's impeachment trial.
But in fact there were witnesses — at least to a process intended to protect the president, not the Constitution.
Take it not just from Democrats, but from Trump's former chief of staff, John Kelly, who said before Friday's vote that ending the trial without witnesses is "only a job half done." Seemingly a partial trial fully convinced some Republicans, including Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander, that Trump acted improperly.
"There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens [Joe and his son Hunter]," Alexander said in a statement. "The House managers," he continued, "have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.' "
But few of Alexander's GOP colleagues were willing to climb that mountain, and he ended up joining them in voting 51-49 to defeat a motion to call witnesses. Many continued to parrot the president's characterization of the shakedown as a "perfect" call. That's why new witnesses were warranted — including potentially the key witness, former national security adviser John Bolton.
A leaked manuscript of Bolton's unpublished book indicates that he directly contradicts the president's account of why military aid to Ukraine was withheld.
Further revelations emerged before Friday's vote. According to the New York Times, Trump directed Bolton "to help with his pressure campaign to extract damaging information on Democrats from Ukrainian officials" during an Oval Office meeting that included acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney — one of the other witnesses sought by Democrats — as well as the president's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and the White House counsel leading the impeachment defense, Pat Cipollone.
"That meeting never happened," Trump said in a statement on Friday. If only sworn testimony could determine who is telling the truth.