Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
This commentary was submitted on behalf of several members of the group Land Conservation Natural Burial (conservationburialmn.org), which has the goal of establishing a conservation burial ground in the greater Twin Cities. Their names are listed below.
•••
Visiting departed loved ones in a natural setting, such as a forest, oak savanna or prairie, brings solace and healing to those grieving. We’re grateful that the Schramm family featured in the Oct. 6 article “Finding a shady, final resting spot in Minnesota” found an option that fits what they wanted at Better Place Forests. Unfortunately, the information presented in the article prevents families from making truly informed and environmentally friendly after-death decisions.
Better Place Forests is a leafy memorial forest where families may place remains at the base of a tree, or in the future, scatter them in the “shared grove.” It is not, as the article implies, a part of the growing conservation and green burial movement in the United States. In fact, there is no burial at Better Place, for that would require cemetery designation and regulation. It is also not fully protected by a land trust conservation easement, though it does have a Washington County conditional use permit.
Since only cremated remains are accepted, it bears stating that cremation is not exactly earth-friendly. Flame-based cremation of human remains is a significant source of mercury emissions, according to a 2020 study by the Environmental Protection Agency. This is due to mercury in dental fillings, as well as mercury in blood and tissues (when buried with the body, fillings remain inert). Other toxic emissions associated with flame-based cremation include, but are not limited to, carbon dioxide that exacerbates climate change, as well as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, which contribute to the formation of acid rain.
The article also misinforms readers about water cremation. Water cremation is not rare, but readily available in Minnesota — many people just don’t know that there are different cremation options. Flame-based and water-based cremation both have the same end result, but the process to get there is different. While flame-based cremation uses enough fossil fuel to drive a gas-powered car about 500 miles, water-based cremation uses significantly less fuel and has an overall lower carbon footprint making it a “greener” option.