The unpaid furloughs that Gov. Tim Pawlenty seeks for state employees aren't part of his plan to close the state budget deficit, but they could be used to help avoid layoffs, a state official said Friday.
The proposal to give state workers up to 24 unpaid days off in each of the next two years "is not something that was figured into the governor's budget planning," said Curt Yoakum, spokesman for the state management agency. "It's just a possible tool that's not available right now, that might be used to avoid layoffs."
But many state workers aren't convinced that forced unpaid leave would foreclose the possibility of job cuts.
"No one is saying that if they furlough workers, they're not going to lay workers off," said John Sokatch, an enrollment representative with MinnesotaCare, the state health insurance program.
State negotiators introduced the idea of mandating unpaid leave for public workers last weekend during contract talks with AFSCME Council 5 and the Minnesota Association of Professional Employees (MAPE), the state's two largest public employee unions.
It's a lousy option but probably one of the better ones available right now, said John Budd, a human resources professor with the University of Minnesota's Carlson School of Management.
Losing two days a month, he said, is a better deal than 30 or 31 -- in other words, losing your job altogether.
Still, "for those who are struggling to make ends meet already, losing even a couple more days a month can be a very difficult situation," Budd said.