Listen and subscribe to our podcast: Via Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Stitcher
Minnesota winters are unpredictable. That's what either makes the state great or a major bummer — depending on whom you ask.
The land of 10,000 (frozen) lakes has a nationwide reputation for brutal, relentless winter months, which is why when Tia Smythe moved to Minnesota from Chicago 15 years ago, she was expecting worse.
Her curiosity spiked when she was questioned on her decision to move here, especially when a Bostonian friend asked how she "survived."
"You guys seem to get way more snow than we do," Smythe recalled telling her friend. "I don't know why you're so freaked out about Minnesota winters."
Does Minnesota actually have the worst winters? Smythe waded through websites and decided to turn to Curious Minnesota, our community-driven reporting project fueled by questions from readers, when she couldn't find a definitive answer.
What does "worst" actually mean? Again, it depends on who you ask. For kids excited to hit the sledding hills, "worst" means a balmy 50-degree day with no snowfall. On the other hand, there are many Minnesota adults who longingly daydream for exactly that.
Minnesota winters, which many experts say encompasses late November to late March, are truly unpredictable. In April 2018, the Twin Cities alone received a record 26 inches of snowfall for the month. That said, Minnesota does not receive the most snowfall on average, even within the continental United States. When it comes to individual cities, places like Blue Canyon, Calif., and Mount Washington, N.H., received, in some cases, nearly three times the amount of average snowfall during the winter months than that of snowy Minnesota cities like International Falls.