
Photo credit: Carlos Gonzalez, Star Tribune
Welcome to our morning-after Vikings blog, where we'll revisit every game by looking at three players who stood out, three concerns for the team, three trends to watch and one big question. Here we go:
In two losses to the Bears last year — arguably the two games that most defined their disappointing season — the Vikings' frustrations mounted particularly around their inability to run the ball against Vic Fangio's defense. Fangio is now the Broncos' head coach, where he presides over a defense ranked fourth in the NFL. And though the Broncos were ranked just 17th against the run, the Vikings talked all week about how tough their challenge would be to move the ball against Denver.
Their furious comeback, which saw them erase a 20-0 deficit on the way to a 27-23 win, was their biggest since 1992 and tied the fourth-biggest rally in franchise history. It also helped the Vikings win without the ground game that's become the centerpiece of their offense.
The Vikings, who had just 37 yards on 18 attempts on Sunday, became just the fifth team in the NFL this season to win without rushing for 40 yards in a game (the 49ers also did it Sunday). Those teams are 5-24 this season.
The obvious retort here is, "Well, of course teams lose when they can't run the ball," since many teams in the pass-first NFL log most of their rushing attempts when they have leads.
But the Vikings are unique in the sense they've made a point to stick with their run game in most contexts this season; they ran for 198 yards in a Week 2 loss to the Packers where they fell behind 21-0, and before Sunday, they'd run almost as often as they'd thrown on first and second when trailing this season (73 passes to 71 runs). Even when trailing by seven points or more this season, the Vikings have run the ball 45 percent of the time on first and second down; only the 49ers (who'd run just 23 plays on offense while trailing by more than seven this season) had run on a larger percentage of plays when they were behind.
So it was striking to see the game the Vikings played in the second half on Sunday, when they went almost exclusively into a hurry-up offense and ran Dalvin Cook on just seven of their 35 plays in the final two quarters. Listening to what Mike Zimmer said after the game, it sounded as though the Vikings made the switch more to create a spark than to respond to the game circumstances.