We all want it all. We want succulent food and slim waists, powerful engines and great gas mileage, suntans without skin damage.
As an organization attuned to the desires of its remarkably loyal fans, the Wild has tried to have it all, tried to field playoff teams while amassing young talent. Predictably, the new front office, in pursuing those two sometimes mutually exclusive goals, has struggled to balance instant gratification with responsible planning.
With the trade of Martin Havlat to San Jose for Dany Heatley, Chuck Fletcher once again has made a move that doesn't help his team rebuild, a move that could be considered a risk because of Heatley's problematic past.
In two bold exchanges with the Sharks, though, Fletcher might have accomplished the improbable. He might have improved the Wild's chances of winning this year, while increasing their chances of winning five years from now.
Trade analyses are as fraught with risk as trades themselves. The final verdict on them can turn on injury or a team's fortunes, can be subject to locker-room chemistry or coaching ingenuity, or even change from year to year.
At this point, Fletcher deserves praise for both of his recent trades, because he addressed his franchise's two biggest needs, scoring and young talent, without sacrificing players who were part of his long-term plan.
To acquire Heatley, Devin Setoguchi, Charlie Coyle and Zack Phillips, he dealt Brent Burns and Havlat. Burns was likely to leave in free agency in a year, and Havlat was, like Heatley, a 30-year-old forward with wonderful hands and a problematic past.
Havlat helped cost Todd Richards his job and fought with captain Mikko Koivu a day after Havlat's agent complained about his role. The guy was a nagging headache.