Minneapolis rare coin dealer David Marion is heading to prison for bilking investors out of more than $3 million.
In St. Paul, the Ramsey County attorney's office just charged four women with an elaborate identity theft scheme involving hundreds of Social Security numbers, dates of birth and driver's license numbers. According to the charges, a former state employee stole a lot of the information while at her work computer.
In Washington, senior policy adviser John Beale is expected to plead guilty on Monday to stealing nearly $900,000 over 12 years from his employer, the Environmental Protection Agency, by receiving pay and bonuses he didn't earn.
These cautionary tales appear so regularly it's hard to feel shocked anymore. But, after years of consuming them and, sometimes, reporting them, I still wonder:
Is it easier to be good or to be bad? Or more fairly, realizing that those are loaded words, is it easier to behave badly — or well?
I'm not talking morality here. We all know, including those genuinely remorseful for their actions, that our world would be a far sunnier place if everybody played by the rules. And I realize that we all have the capacity to go down either road.
But it's exhausting to think about having to keep track of so many below-deck details, about tortured sleep and loved ones trampled by ill-advised actions.
So, why do some people do it?