Rested, Revived and Renewed
By Rochelle Olson
April Fool’s is past so we’re the only fools at last and we’re all returning to the Capitol rested, revived and renewed under an April snow. Hey, gimme a break, I had to dig up a starting sentence from somewhere. So yes, the Easter break is over and everybody get on back to the Capitol now.
In election-year news around the country, a New York judge expanded the gag order on former President Donald Trump, while the Florida Supreme Court upheld a 15-week ban on abortion, but voters will have there say both there and in a slew of other states. Trump will go after President Joe Biden on border and crime issues during visits to Michigan and Wisconsin, which holds its presidential primary today. More on that battleground state from Greta Kaul.
Because everyone else was away, I turned my attention to the state Supreme Court for oral arguments on the 2023 law restoring voting rights to felons upon release from incarceration. The Minnesota Voters Alliance is challenging the law and their lawyer James Dickey got a whole bunch of vigorous questions from the bench. The challenge to the law was tossed by Anoka County District Thomas Lehmann late last year for lack of legal standing. The court didn’t sound inclined to reinstate the lawsuit.
As I was writing, I pulled up my story from a year ago when the court said it wasn’t unconstitutional to bar felons from voting. Chief Justice Natalie Hudson, who was then an associate justice, wrote what read like a heartfelt dissent that the law was unconstitutional because it disenfranchised Black and Native American voters at much higher rates.
“The court effectively sanctions a pernicious statutory racial classification regime that maintains the disenfranchisement of large swaths of Minnesota’s communities of color, thereby diminishing their political power and influence in this state,” Hudson wrote. “We are better than this.”
My favorite moment in the hour-plus oral arguments came at the end when Dickey paused and thanked the justices who are retiring for their service. Not by name, of course, but he just took a moment. Justices G. Barry Anderson leaves next week with Justice Margaret Chutich to follow in a couple months.
We got a peek at who might be succeeding the two jurists as Walz’s office released the six finalists who will be interviewed later this month and I have one question: Is everyone required to work at Jones Day? If you’ve got some free time, read this story from the New York Times about that firm. Anyway, five of the six are women, meaning the court could return to a distaff majority.