Karla Arredondo-Payan wants to keep helping her two younger brothers, who are American citizens. She wants to continue her career in nonprofits, pursue a master's degree and stay in the home she owns in north Minneapolis.
But her status in the United States is precarious.
On Tuesday, she closely followed oral arguments on the fate of the Deferred Action Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy before the U.S. Supreme Court, which will decide next year the legality of President Donald Trump's move to end Obama-era legal protections for immigrants like Arredondo-Payan who were brought into the country illegally as children. The court is expected to make a decision by June.
"I try not to worry, but constantly that's on my mind now," said Arredondo-Payan, 25, who is a community organizer with the Nokomis East Neighborhood Association. "I want to be focused on work … while at the same time trying to balance my own worries with DACA."
The Trump administration argued that DACA was illegal and the government had the right to end it, and the conservative-majority court seemed poised to side with the president.
DACA recipients don't currently have a path to citizenship, and they and their supporters are pushing for a permanent legal fix in Congress.
Emilia Gonzalez Avalos said they need a clear commitment from pro-immigrant policymakers for a sustainable solution for DACA recipients "so that their lives cannot be used as a bargaining chip every so often, every time it's convenient. We are hopeful — we believe that the truth is on our side, we believe that the American public is on our side, and we also believe that the Constitution is on our side."
She is executive director of Unidos-MN, where the majority of the staff is DACA recipients, though Avalos is not. The grassroots organization worked to pass the approval of DACA in 2012 and advocates for immigrant youth, most of them Latino.