Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
“We celebrate and are committed to the principles of diversity and inclusion,” said a job advertisement for a position as a judicial law clerk with the Minnesota Court of Appeals posted on the Minnesota Judicial Branch’s website.
As someone with autism, I was inclined to interpret this statement literally.
However, after my experience of applying to different positions with the Minnesota Judicial Branch over the past year, I no longer take it at face value.
At the moment, it’s a statement of aspiration rather than a description of concrete reality.
Three months after being hired as a judicial law clerk for a Minnesota district judge in early 2023, I was diagnosed with autism. Less than a year later, I had left my job — even though I was well compensated.
Why did I leave? To take some much-needed time for myself to critically reflect upon what it means to be an autistic person existing in an ableist society — and what supports I would need going forward to thrive in an American employment context that, still too often, treats an employee only as a means to a particular economic end.