An Anoka County judge rejected a conservative group's lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Minnesota's new law restoring voting rights to felons upon their release from prison.
District Judge Thomas Lehmann ruled Wednesday that the Minnesota Voters Alliance did not meet the legal threshold to sue because their arguments amounted to a "disagreement with policy," and that they failed to prove that the Legislature overstepped its authority when it voted last session to extend voting rights to the formerly incarcerated.
Until then, those released from jail or prison were required to wait until they had completed probation — which could take decades —and paid all outstanding fines to regain their right to vote.
Attorneys representing the Alliance argued that a clause in the state's Constitution suggests that felons cannot vote ''unless restored to civil rights." They interpreted that phrase to mean that the individual must fulfill their entire felony sentence, including probation, before becoming eligible to vote.
''The major premise of this argument is fundamentally flawed,'' wrote Judge Lehman, who noted that the state Constitution does not specify ''restored to all civil rights.'' He cited a Minnesota Supreme Court ruling from February that placed the burden on state lawmakers to decide whether to restore voting rights after a felon fulfilled their prison sentence.
James Dickey, who represents the Alliance, vowed to appeal the ruling and seek an accelerated review with the state Supreme Court — before the 2024 election.
"We think it's important enough that the court should decide this now and end any uncertainty about whether the Legislature had the authority to do what it did," said Dickey, senior trial counsel at the Upper Midwest Law Center. He brushed off criticism by some DFL lawmakers who have accused the Alliance of attempting to suppress the vote of marginalized groups.
"That's categorically false. Those are political attacks," he countered. "We are bringing a lawsuit based on what we think the Constitution of Minnesota requires — no more, no less."