Less-restrictive policy beefs up MIAC rosters

  • Article by: DENNIS BRACKIN , Star Tribune
  • Updated: September 25, 2012 - 11:37 PM

By letting D-I and D-II transfers keep their redshirt years, more talent has migrated to the league.

hide

Willie Schneider (33) warms up with team mates before a football game against the University of Wisconsin River Falls (UW River Falls) September 11, 2010 in O'Shaughnessy Stadium. The Tommies won their home opener 27-3.

Photo: Mike Ekern, University Of St. Thomas

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Dan Dobson decided to transfer from the University of Minnesota Duluth in the spring of 2010. Several months earlier, the Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference loosened its rules, allowing NCAA Division I and II transfers who had used a redshirt year to retain that year of eligibility.

Dobson, who had redshirted his first season at UMD and played sparingly in 2009, opted for St. Olaf in part because the Oles could offer him three full years of eligibility. Under the previous rule, MIAC teams could have offered only two years, and Dobson might not have helped lead a resurgence of St. Olaf football.

"[Two years of eligibility] might have changed my thoughts," said Dobson, who is closing in on several school passing records. "I definitely would have explored my options a little deeper, and seen what other possibilities I had."

He would have found plenty of options more attractive than the MIAC from an eligibility standpoint. Commissioner Dan McKane said the MIAC historically has had the most restrictive transfer policy among the nation's Division III schools, and in 2008 was the only Division III conference not honoring the redshirt years of transfers.

McKane said the number of students transferring has been on the upswing since the mid-2000s, and conference administrators didn't want prospective enrollees going elsewhere because of the restrictive transfer policy.

"We were trying not to prevent potential transfers from looking at MIAC schools, and having that rule steer them away from our conference," McKane said. "We want to get the most talented kids possible, both in the classroom and on the field."

The bottom line: If the MIAC wanted to continue to compete at a national level, not only in football but all sports, the league had to operate by the same rules as schools such as Mount Union (Ohio) and Wisconsin-Whitewater.

The big winner: St. Thomas

The league is now starting to see the effect of players entering the league since the rule was enacted in September of 2009, and it has been dramatic. Most schools have benefitted, often at key positions.

Dobson will leave St. Olaf as one of the most prolific quarterbacks in MIAC history. Augsburg had its first winning season a year ago since 1999 thanks largely to quarterback Marcus Brumm, a fifth-year senior who transferred from Minnesota State Mankato. Bethel's starting tailback, Brandon Marquardt, is a transfer from MSU Mankato, and defensive end Kyle Asmus transferred from Bemidji State.

But no school has benefitted more than St. Thomas, and it's no exaggeration to say that the rule is a major reason the Tommies have won 27 consecutive regular-season games, and are shooting for their third undefeated league title in a row.

The Tommies' streak of 10-0 regular seasons began in 2010, when five senior starters -- Division III All-Americas Brady Ervin (Iowa State) and Josh Ostrue (St. Cloud State) plus all-MIAC players Tommy Becker (Gophers), Bryan Villar (Augustana) and Zach Sturm (St. Cloud State) were playing an extra year after the rule change.

Three other transfers from the Gophers -- center Curtis James, linebacker Harry Pitera and fullback Willie Schneider -- were key contributors on the 2010 team and part of the nucleus of this year's team, ranked No. 3 nationally in Division III.

"It's been critical," St. Thomas coach Glenn Caruso said. "No doubt about it, it's allowed us to accelerate our progress."

Pitera was a freshman on the 2010 team, and said the chance to break in playing with former Division I players such as Ervin, Becker and James helped set the tone for the team's younger players, and the success that followed.

"That played a big part in my development," Pitera said. "Most teams in the MIAC have benefitted from the rule change, but it's benefitted us the most."

No one knows that better than St. John's coach John Gagliardi, whose perennial power Johnnies have fallen behind the Tommies in recent years.

"Yes, it makes it more of an even field [for MIAC teams] in the playoffs," Gagliardi said. "But it sure has made it tough for the rest of the league to keep up with St. Thomas. They've got enough ammunition without getting any more help."

Location, location, location

Caruso said transfers tend to look at four factors: a balance between academics and athletics, a winning program, location and a school that will maximize their remaining eligibility. Gagliardi thinks one factor above all else has helped the Tommies.

"I think, from my far-off observation, they're getting guys who went to Twin Cities high schools and want to come back to the Twin Cities when they transfer," he said. "It's kind of a natural."

Indeed, McKane said that in looking at transfers in all sports, St. Thomas and Augsburg tend to get the most athletes, lending credence that location is an influential consideration. Augsburg's powerful wrestling program, for example, frequently gets transfers from the Gophers, similar to St. Thomas in football.

The highest-rated academic schools, such as Carleton and Macalester, tend to get the fewest athletic transfers, McKane said.

Augsburg football coach Frank Haege said he likes transfers because they have a much clearer vision of what they want in a college -- and athletics -- than high school seniors.

"Those kids aren't looking at campus tours, or getting schmoozed," Haege said. "They just want to play. ... For us, in general, transfers are a vital part for us to be competitive."

Of course, Haege, like Gagliardi, doesn't have to look far to see a downside with transfers.

"Our staff was going over stuff during the offseason, and when we got to St. Olaf, I said, 'Dobson is back again?'" Haege said. "He's been around so long, it's almost like having a pro out there."

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 32 FINAL
Team Carter 28
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 106 FINAL
New Orleans 109
Indiana 106 FINAL
Orlando 99
LA Clippers 120 FINAL
Phoenix 100
Minnesota 100 FINAL
Atlanta 112
Detroit 110 FINAL
Toronto 114
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
San Antonio 101
Boston 111 FINAL
Golden State 114
Washington 117 FINAL
Denver 115
Houston 99 FINAL
LA Lakers 87
Team Toews 17 FINAL
Team Foligno 12
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 55 FINAL
Albany 69
Niagara 64 FINAL
Iona 87
Notre Dame 81 FINAL
NC State 78
Belmont 63 FINAL
Tennessee St 55
Creighton 50 FINAL
Villanova 71
Northwestern 67 FINAL
Maryland 68
Washington 56 FINAL
Utah 77
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 63 FINAL
UMass Lowell 72
Iowa State 58 FINAL
(8) Texas 57
Southern Ill 61 FINAL
Wichita State 80
(15) Duke 74 FINAL
(12) North Carolina 67
Miami-Florida 55 FINAL
(4) Louisville 68
(21) Minnesota 61 FINAL
(25) Rutgers 66
California 72 FINAL
UCLA 57
(11) Stanford 71 FINAL
USC 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Do you favor the plan for expanded athletic facilities at the U of M?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close