The law of averages suggests that outcomes tend to even out over time. But the law sure works better when applied to nearly infinite spans of time as opposed to things such as, say, a 16-game NFL season.
The nature of averages and the NFL are both beautifully observed thanks to a recent ESPN.com project using its "Football Power Index," which finds that the NFC North is essentially a three-way tossup between the Vikings, Bears and Packers.
Using the average of 20,000 simulated seasons, all three are projected to win between 8.6 and 8.8 games — and the Vikings are given the slightest of edges over the other two.
But ESPN also isolated on one specific simulation — No. 1,721, according to the website — to project outcomes for all 267 games in the season for the entire NFL. In that one simulation, the Vikings lost 27-13 to the Falcons in Week 1 and went just 7-9 for the season while the Bears went 8-7-1. The Packers dominated the NFC North, going 13-3.
These differences in scale, though — one vs. 20,000 — are fascinating when placed side by side.
And picking just one out of 20,000 reveals a haunting but marvelous truth about sports: The season that actually does happen doesn't necessarily most accurately reflect the composite strengths and weaknesses of teams.
It's a snap shot of randomness, fortunate bounces, magnificent performances and being in the right place at the right time (or wrong place at the wrong time).
But you can't play the 2019 season 20,000 times in real life (although NFL owners might love to try to add it to the new collective bargaining agreement to goose TV revenue). Only one season can become reality.