It's good to hear that more of our kids are getting vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer.
But, as my colleague Jeremy Olson reported last week, the increase isn't enough to quell concerns of public health officials who wish that far more of our kids were getting protection against the disease that kills about 4,000 women annually in the United States.
I'm not surprised that putting "sex" and "shots" in the same sentence results in parental alarm bells ringing. That's a good thing. But it's important to make decisions based on facts.
Parents should know, for example, that potential side effects of HPV shots are minimal and are similar to those of many other childhood vaccinations. And, far from encouraging sexual activity, the vaccine, coupled with an age-appropriate conversation about healthy sexuality, will far more likely lead to the opposite result.
About a third of girls ages 13 to 17 received the full series of three doses of HPV vaccine in 2010, up from 18 percent in 2008. But doctors were hoping for a rate closer to 60 percent.
The vaccine now is being recommended for boys in that age group as well.
HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the U.S. Nearly 80 percent of women and 50 percent of men will carry, then clear, the virus at some point in their lives without knowing it, said Amy Allina, program director of the National Women's Health Network in Washington, D.C.
Allina doesn't just understand parental skepticism. She praises it. One of her organization's missions is to "challenge drugs and devices" being brought to the marketplace to assure that they are based on good science.