Regarding the Jan. 7 article "Tax bill's quirks may swing state taxes — up or down" (followed by "Taxpayers get $813M warning," Jan. 11): This law will have a profound impact on our state. For those of you concerned about increased school class sizes, protection for seniors in nursing homes and access to health care, pay attention to how the state responds to the new tax law. If we simply pass "federal conformity," Minnesota will have a radically different tax code with radically different priorities. If we do nothing, many of our taxpayers will be taxed twice on the same income. We must demand that the governor and the Legislature push for solutions to the negative impact of this new law.
Other high-service states are responding ("States maneuver to offset tax law," Jan. 7): One good idea is to change state income taxes into employer-side payroll taxes, with relief for low-income earners. This way, we can avoid the double taxation and preserve the independence of our state to choose how we tax our citizens and provide government services. Another idea is to sue the federal government on equal protection grounds: States with low taxes and low services benefit at the cost of high-tax, high-service states. Whatever the response is, Minnesota must not let the federal government dictate dramatic changes to our state government. Our leaders need to step up and protect our state's values.
Carolyn Jackson, Edina
The writer is a DFL candidate for the Legislature.
• • •
The good news is that state leaders are preparing to deal with the impending tax increase that Minnesotans will receive as a result of the new federal tax law. The bad news is that there is no mention of figuring out strategies for dealing with the loss of deductibility for property and state income taxes. Other states such as New York, California, New Jersey, etc., are creating new approaches. It is imperative that our leaders do the same and start now.
Arne Carlson, Minneapolis
The writer was governor of Minnesota from 1991 to 1999.
HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD
A $55,000 office renovation, 'eyebrow-raising'? What a smear.
That was a cheap shot at Hennepin County Board Member Debbie Goettel in the Jan. 11 editorial about her office renovations ("An eyebrow-raising use of public dollars").
Why was she given an unusable office in the first place, and why should she have to spend her time over several months finding the "best deals" to make it usable? Surely a county commissioner has better things to do than shop for furniture — and that might have made a more compelling editorial.