A court has decided to reduce the sentence of the perpetrator of the destruction of the statue of Columbus located on State Capitol grounds to a paltry 100 hours of community service ("Plea deal offered in toppling of statue," Dec. 8). The cost of repairs to the statue, if they were to be made, would be around $150,000.
It's little wonder then why the Twin Cities area is currently the center of one of the worst crime waves in its history. Any would-be criminal would look at this case and feel confident that any act of wanton destruction would be automatically classified as mere civil disobedience and dismissed in an effort to "unite the community."
We can argue the pros and cons of having a Columbus statue on the site, but there are legitimate ways to address this that would not permit lawbreakers to destroy public property because they are offended by its presence. Neither should some assistant DA hireling be allowed to forgo appropriate punishment under state law. And what of the $150,000 in damages? Or should our property sit unrepaired because Gov. Tim Walz is more concerned about political correctness than the rule of law?
This miscarriage of justice is an affront to the citizens of Minnesota with no justification other than to appease a particular group. It's a certainty this won't be the last time the state will have to deal with this kind of destruction, since it has allowed a clear precedent of inaction to be shown to anyone contemplating a similar act.
Raymond Rossberg, Eden Prairie
MINNEAPOLIS POLICING
Tunnel vision seems to be the order of the day for the City Council
Why is it so hard for members of the Minneapolis City Council to comprehend that the money they want to pay for new public health and safety initiatives does not necessarily need to come from the police budget? ("$8M cut to MPD moves forward," front page, Dec. 8.) As it stands, those initiatives are likely to get shot down by way of the mayor's veto, since the money that would pay for them would be strip-mined out of the police budget.
There are other avenues through which such initiatives could be funded. Consider just one: There are 425,000 citizens in Minneapolis proper, according to 2018 census data; if each citizen was charged a $25 once-a-year fee, this would result in a $10.6 million annual revenue stream. Thus, with something as simple as a small once-a-year fee you could have millions more for these initiatives than they are trying to suck out of the police budget while leaving the police budget untouched at a moment when carjackings were up 537% this November compared with last, and when in October alone nearly a million dollars was paid in police overtime.
By now it's clear to anyone living in reality that having fewer police funded on slashed budgets is not the utopian answer some were sold, since it stands to reason that if it were true, right now things ought to be better than ever, given that we have less police than we've had in years. "Defund" is defunct, but the council will go down with it because some of its members value their ideology more than citizen safety.
Leif Erik Bergerud, Minneapolis
• • •
A teacher once told me that except for the original, all unfinished tasks have a template to follow. I would ask the Minneapolis City Council which metro areas around the world, or any other models, they have considered when it comes to law enforcement reform. There are some that work.