A dozen years after it landed in Chaska, "Nature Morte" still causes a ripple.
The massive abstract concrete and metal sculpture appears incongruous amid conventional suburban subdivisions. City Administrator Matt Podhradsky says his wife sometimes comments on the piece as they drive by.
"She'll look at me and say, 'Really? Did you guys really have to put that up?' I tell her it was a citizens committee that chose it," Podhradsky says.
In an era when public art is flourishing in Twin Cities suburbs, officials and artists alike are navigating the fissures in fickle public opinion, weighing aesthetic and economic concerns.
Communities are formalizing rules around how pieces are chosen, and by whom, sometimes opting to get feedback with public comment periods and "peoples' choice" contests. Some, like Hopkins and Edina, are testing the waters with short-term installations before committing to permanent ones.
"There always are some people who love a piece and some who hate it," said Juli Johnson, Eagan's parks and recreation director. The city, now in the process of expanding its public art policy beyond parks to include all city-owned property, has a small selection committee but also a 30-day comment period for residents to weigh in. "It's an investment, and we want to make sure it speaks to our community values," Johnson said.
Eagan also regularly looks for ways to involve residents in the making of public art. Later this month, an artist-designed mural painted by residents 12 and older at this summer's annual art festival will make its permanent home in Eagan's Community Center.
But cities' desire to be inclusive can sometimes be frustrating for artists dealing in the public realm. Marcia McEachron, who has wire and metal sculptures throughout the Twin Cities, said she once had to deal with a selection committee with 24 people. "There were just too many people from too many walks of life," she said.