Openness is critical in Minneapolis agreement with departing police chief

Non-disparagement clause could mute constructive discussions.

September 11, 2017 at 11:00PM
Minneapolis Police Chief Janee Harteau stood beside Mayor Betsy Hodges as the two delivered the findings of an internal investigation into the officer-involved shooting of Jamar Clark last November. The investigation found that officers Dustin Schwarze and Mark Ringgenberg met the requirements for use of deadly force and will not face discipline. ] (AARON LAVINSKY/STAR TRIBUNE) aaron.lavinsky@startribune.com The Minneapolis Police Department held a press conference to announce the results of an
Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges, right, has agreed to remove a non-disparagement clause from the settlement package of former Police Chief Janeé Harteau, who resigned under pressure in July. (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

In a welcome turn of events, Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges now says she's "happy to remove'' an overreaching non-disparagement clause from the settlement package of former Police Chief Janeé Harteau.

Hodges' reversal on the clause is the right call, but it never should have been in the agreement to begin with. It's not usual for employee separation agreements — especially those in the private sector — to include non-disparagement language. The idea is that the parties can end a contract early and part ways in a fashion that allows both sides to move on. But the deal initially sought by Hodges overreached.

Harteau resigned in July under pressure from the mayor and City Council members less than a week after the police shooting of Justine Ruszczyk Damond. Hodges wanted an agreement that would prevent Harteau from saying anything negative about the mayor, council members or other high-ranking city officials. In return, they would say nothing negative about Harteau. The deal Harteau's lawyer and City Attorney Susan Segal struck — which was signed by the chief — also would pay Harteau $183,000 through the end of 2018, which would have been the end of her term as chief.

But the ex-chief later objected to the non-disparagement clause, she said, because she wants to be able to answer questions honestly and be truthful about her experiences. And some council members shared her concern because they were not involved in negotiating the deal and rightly believe they should learn from what happened during Harteau's tenure.

As Council Member Linea Palmisano said, "Transparency is important here, and if the chief has feedback for council or for her department, I hope she comes forward with that. … Shouldn't we all be learning lessons and getting feedback?"

Hodges acknowledged last week that the gag order was her idea. "When Chief Harteau asked for a letter of recommendation from me, I thought there was an opportunity for everyone to take the high road and that the non-disparagement clause, which is a common practice in separation agreements, could help bring the negotiation to a close," Hodges said in the statement.

It's no secret that Harteau and Hodges at times had a strained relationship. That makes openness in the separation agreement negotiations even more important.

Some council members also may take issue with the city agreeing to pay Harteau $183,000 through the end of 2018. But the compensation terms are fair given the circumstances of her resignation.

The city's Executive Committee will review the agreement on Wednesday, and the council is expected to vote on it Sept. 20. The package should be approved — without the non-disparagement provision.

about the writer

about the writer

Editorial Board

See Moreicon

More from No Section

See More
FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
Melissa Golden/The New York Times

It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.