The NHL standings had four important categories from its inception in 1917 through the 1998-99 season: W L T Pts.
The league took its first foray into feel-good standings in 1999-2000, when it started awarding a consolation point to a team that lost in overtime. The NHL added another layer to its distorted point totals for the 2005-06 season, when an overtime tie was followed by a shootout -- with the winning team getting a bonus point.
We need this information to realize that the 2003 Wild, the team that thrilled Minnesota with its run to the Western Conference finals, and the 2008 Wild, a team that most Minnesotans feel has the potential to provide greater thrills, basically had identical regular seasons.
The Wild of '03 finished with 95 points. This came with a record of 42-29-10-1 (W-L-T-OL), meaning that team had only one new-age bonus point for an overtime loss. The Wild of '08 finished with 98 points. This came with a record 44-28-2-8 (W-L-OL-SL), getting two points for overtime losses as well as three extra points for winning shootouts.
So, if we were to judge these teams by the same standards (W-L-T) that were good enough for the NHL before 1999, the '03 Wild was 42-30-10 for 94 points, and the '08 Wild was 41-30-11 for 93 points.
There's also this: The '03 Wild had a 20-goal advantage (198-178) over opponents, and the '08 Wild's was five (223-218).
Since the playoffs started eight nights ago, we've been proceeding in the belief that coach Jacques Lemaire was taking a much stronger club into the Stanley Cup tournament this time. Taking another look at the legitimate numbers for the '03 and '08 teams gives some pause in propagating that theory.
Five years ago, Lemaire had a mix of happy-to-be-here veterans, wide-eyed youngsters and a nucleus of solid players in their prime. Not once did you have the impression that those athletes were ignoring the coach.