Sick of the sight of Christopher Columbus, members of the American Indian Movement knocked him off his pedestal at the Minnesota Capitol last year.
At the time, there was no legal way to remove a monument once it had been planted at the Capitol or its grounds.
The state had only ever added statues and memorials to its collection. There was no paperwork, no procedures, no plan for taking monuments away. Not even monuments to people who, upon reflection, turned out to be genocidal seafarers or homegrown Nazis.
A year and a half after a dented Columbus was carted off to a state warehouse, there is still no paperwork, no procedure, no plan for where it should end up. A museum? A scrapyard? Another pedestal?
But the state plans to have a plan.
The Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board has been mulling the question of who does and does not deserve to be celebrated in our public spaces. The board just launched a public comment period to loop Minnesotans into the debate over these two questions:
Question 1: Do you think that there are reasons that the Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board (CAAPB) should alter, reinterpret, or remove an existing monument, memorial, or commemorative artwork on the Minnesota State Capitol grounds?
Question 2: What steps do you suggest the CAAPB include in its process to consider adding, altering, reinterpreting, or removing a monument, memorial, or commemorative artwork on the Minnesota State Capitol grounds?