Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Many years ago, as my wife and I arrived home from the hospital with our newborn twin sons, a maintenance man at our apartment complex offered advice: “Twins, eh? We had 10 kids — including two sets of twins. But don’t ask me how to raise ’em — they’re all different.”
I’ve often recalled his words as our family grew to three children and five grandchildren. Yes, they’re all different. That’s why some of them thrived in traditional public schools while others flourished in smaller, more personalized charter public schools.
As a lifelong journalist and charter school parent/grandparent, I’ve read with interest the Minnesota Star Tribune’s series of articles describing problems at some of the state’s 181 charter schools. In 2024, nine charter schools closed. These failures are concerning. But many facts about charter schools were not included in the newspaper’s reports.
For example, every charter, like every district school, must provide yearly detailed financial data to the Minnesota Department of Education. The MDE shares this information on its Education Report Card.
Also, charter schools are required to hire outside firms to conduct yearly audits which are posted on the charter websites.
And while the newspaper’s reports have questioned oversight and accountability, many of those issues were addressed in the most recent session of the Legislature. New bipartisan laws increase training requirements for charter school board members and administrators. School directors now must have a four-year degree and complete annual training on financial management, instruction and legal obligations. School board members must undergo similar training.