Dear Amy: Recently my partner and I got engaged. My parents won't attend our wedding for religious reasons. (We're both women.)
That's not why I'm writing. The issue is finances. If it were just us paying for the wedding, we'd be going to city hall and then out to a bar with friends. (I am a full-time grad student.) But my partner's parents are willing to foot the bill for a ceremony and reception. They've been supportive of our relationship, treat me like family and are financially able.
I'm wondering how many people I should invite. I have other relatives who, unlike my parents, are supportive of my relationship. But I'm self-conscious about putting a lot of people on my in-laws' tab.
I'm also hesitant to voice my opinions about what I'd like at the wedding and reception. I want to express gratitude for their generosity, but expressing any preferences in planning feels bratty. On the other hand, I know that by remaining quiet I'm running the risk of looking disinterested or ungrateful.
Can you offer some direction?
Amy says: I advocate for couples to finance their own weddings. This involves both parties fully participating to raise the money for their wedding and reception.
In "traditional" weddings, the bride's parents are expected to pay for the wedding reception, and so you could see this offer as hewing to a traditional practice.
Your in-laws-to-be understand that this wedding involves you both. What's missing is your participation in the process. Your embarrassment regarding your parents' lack of involvement seems to be suppressing your own obligation, which is to take part in the planning.