Listen and subscribe to our podcast: Apple Podcasts | Spotify
Choosing where to spend retirement is a big decision.
For most Minnesotans, the answer is ... Minnesota. Most of the state’s retirees stay local. But some are lured elsewhere by warmer climates and economic factors.
A reader wanted to know the financial advantages and disadvantages of remaining in Minnesota for retirement — including taxes and health costs. They sought answers from Curious Minnesota, the Star Tribune’s reader-powered reporting project.
If minimizing taxes is the top priority in choosing a place to retire, Minnesota has some distinct financial disadvantages for retirees. But there are trade-offs to the cheaper routes that should be considered.
“You have to look at the whole picture,” said Steven E. Warren, a certified public accountant in Minneapolis. “Some people think, ‘Oh, Florida has no income tax so it’s clearly going to be a better, less expensive place to retire.’ For others, clearly there are other quality of life issues beyond taxes. In those, generally Minnesota comes out well.”
‘99% of the state is staying put’
Some popular financial websites rank Minnesota among the best states to retire — though not for financial reasons. The state is No. 8 on WalletHub’s list, for example, which balanced Minnesota’s higher cost of living against the state’s top-ranked health care and quality of life. The Motley Fool ranks the state No. 3 overall for retirement, but 39th in the nation for taxes.
Financial matters are important, considering that most Americans will not have enough money for a financially secure retirement, according to the National Institute on Retirement Security. The Institute attributed the problem to the shift from pensions to 401(k) plans starting in the 1980s. 401(k) plans are subject to stock market volatility, as well as savers underinvesting or tapping them in a financial emergency.