Scoggins: Time for the NCAA to end its charade and share profits with athletes

  • Article by: CHIP SCOGGINS , Star Tribune
  • Updated: April 2, 2014 - 12:01 AM

Are Northwestern football players employees?  Things are pointing that way.

Photo: M. Spencer Green • AP,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Ohio State athletic director Gene Smith is scheduled to receive a bonus worth $18,000 because a Buckeyes wrestler won an individual national title.

Think about that for a second. An athletic director with an annual base salary of nearly $1 million is guaranteed an extra week of pay — based on a performance clause in his contract — even though he had no personal investment in the blood, sweat and sacrifice that Logan Stieber put into winning the 141-pound championship.

But by all means, the NCAA and its member institutions should continue to cling to their archaic notion of amateurism. It’s all about doing what’s best for the student-athletes, right? Nonsense.

Thankfully, a movement to reward college athletes financially beyond a scholarship continues to gain momentum. This era of astronomical TV contracts has become a game-changer and further exposed the hypocrisy of the amateurism model.

The NCAA is under siege in public perception and with ongoing antitrust lawsuits. Last week, a regional director of the National Labor Relations Board found that Northwestern football players fit the criteria of employees and should be allowed to unionize.

Pending legal appeals, that landmark case could redefine college athletics and how they operate. College athletes functioning as a union is a fascinating idea, but it’s such a radical departure that it’s difficult to comprehend the endgame.

Would athletes be able to strike? Could athletic departments institute lockouts? Would every scholarship athlete in every sport be granted membership?

This is a complicated issue with many tentacles, but the Northwestern case should provide more leverage in the anti-amateurism crusade. It’s time for real reform. There is unprecedented money being pumped into college sports these days, but the athletes — the ones who provide the labor — remain unpaid participants.

TV networks pay hundreds of millions for broadcast rights. Football and basketball coaches make obscene salaries. The arms race has changed the financial scope of college athletics for everyone except athletes. That doesn’t seem right.

The NCAA needs to adopt a system that allows athletes to receive a stipend (preferably $3,000 to $5,000 annually) and also profit from their likenesses. We’re not talking about exorbitant payouts, but something that recognizes that athletes deserve a cut of the expanding pie.

Major conferences have expressed support for a stipend model to serve as a full-cost scholarship. The problem is, smaller conferences balk at that idea because they lack the financial means to pay stipends.

I wouldn’t support changes that force midtier athletic departments to eliminate sports. But realistically, Texas and Tulsa reside in separate athletic universes, and it’s time the NCAA and schools to create a new model.

The common rebuttal in this debate is that athletes receive full-ride scholarships, private tutoring and extra benefits not available to normal students. That’s true, and a free education should not be minimized in light of ridiculous tuition costs. Athletes don’t leave school saddled with hefty student loans.

But scholarship athletes are not normal students, either, in terms of their responsibilities and value to universities. College football resembles a job in time commitment between practices, film study, weight training, travel, meetings and study hall.

Then there’s the financial aspect. How much do you think Florida’s athletic department and entire university profited off Tim Tebow’s prolific career? How many Johnny Manziel jerseys did Texas A&M sell the past two years?

And yet we’re supposed to accept that Manziel deserves not a penny of that action while others get rich off his likeness? Surely the NCAA and its members can develop some mechanism that would allow athletes to profit from their star status.

Would that create some other consequences? Perhaps. Former Gophers quarterback Bryan Cupito joked that his autograph would have fetched “seven cents,” but he wonders about potential jealousy inside the locker room.

“At first I think it would definitely make things hard,” he said. “But over time, 10 or 20 years from now, people will understand it.”

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Toronto 104 FINAL
Indiana 91
Cleveland 103 FINAL
Detroit 95
Milwaukee 109 FINAL
Miami 102
Memphis 109 FINAL
Dallas 90
Chicago 113 FINAL
Golden State 111
Washington 98 FINAL
LA Lakers 92
NY Rangers 1 FINAL
NY Islanders 4
Arizona 3 FINAL(SO)
Philadelphia 4
Winnipeg 3 FINAL
Pittsburgh 5
Washington 3 FINAL
Columbus 4
Tampa Bay 2 FINAL
Carolina 4
Dallas 2 FINAL
Montreal 3
Detroit 5 FINAL
Florida 4
Colorado 3 FINAL(OT)
Nashville 4
Buffalo 1 FINAL
Calgary 4
Minnesota 2 FINAL
Edmonton 1
Anaheim 4 FINAL
Vancouver 0
Ball State 47 FINAL
Akron 59
Northern Ill 46 FINAL
Bowling Green 56
Western Mich 71 FINAL
Buffalo 77
Ohio 40 FINAL
Eastern Mich 76
Xavier 66 FINAL
Georgetown 53
Vanderbilt 62 FINAL
Georgia 70
West Virginia 65 FINAL
Kansas State 59
Central Mich 53 FINAL
Kent State 63
Saint Josephs 48 FINAL
La Salle 53
Nebraska 44 FINAL
Michigan 58
Miami-Ohio 65 FINAL
Toledo 70
Tulsa 62 FINAL
Tulane 55
George Washington 48 FINAL
VA Commonwealth 72
Pittsburgh 67 FINAL
Virginia Tech 70
Indiana State 78 FINAL
Evansville 89
Tabor College 53 FINAL
Oral Roberts 94
Florida 52 FINAL
Alabama 50
Tennessee 64 FINAL
Arkansas 69
Texas A&M 71 FINAL
Auburn 61
Baylor 53 FINAL
Oklahoma State 64
DePaul 0 Postponed
Providence 0
Michigan State 0 Postponed
Rutgers 0
Wyoming 44 FINAL
Utah State 56
Fresno State 47 FINAL
San Diego St 58
Nevada 62
SD Christian 54 FINAL
CS-Bakersfield 79
Colorado State 78 FINAL
Boise State 82
Temple 71 FINAL
UCF 54
Campbell 42 FINAL
Presbyterian 51
Coastal Carolina 65 FINAL
High Point 73
Gardner-Webb 49 FINAL
Radford 59
UNC-Asheville 58 FINAL
Liberty 62
Winthrop 63 FINAL
Longwood 62
Columbia International 33 FINAL
Charleston Southern 74
Tulane 63 FINAL
Houston 46
(3) Baylor 89 FINAL
TCU 67
Navy 49 FINAL
American Univ 59
Valparaiso 42 FINAL
Illinois-Chicago 60


question of the day

Poll: What chance does the Wild have of making the playoffs?

Weekly Question





Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters