The answer on whether to hold the inauguration as planned or slip inside, as the Star Tribune Editorial Board urges, is in the last words of its own editorial: "Presentation matters" ("Move Biden's swearing-in inside," Jan. 17).
There has to be some kind of special event to provide the message that we are closing the chapter on President Donald Trump and turning the page, hopefully, to a new sanity. We can't let the delusional and their perhaps well-meaning but deceived and misled followers succeed. By skulking inside for the swearing-in, we will hand them evidence that they have successfully interfered with our democratic and governmental processes. If they want to make a mess at the perimeters, so be it. We'll still have cameras on what's important and show the world that still we persisted.
Presentation matters.
Dennis Fazio, Minneapolis
• • •
Another precedent for the Editorial Board's position encouraging an indoor inauguration is the relatively recent second inaugural of Ronald Reagan. Due to the weather a (presumably) hasty decision was made to have the Jan. 20, 1985, ceremony in the White House, followed the next day by a larger, public one in the Capitol rotunda.
It would make enormous sense to do something similar this week. Any chance for a sense of normalcy is a ship that has, regrettably, already sailed.
Brian Kaatz, Park Rapids
TRUMP AND IMPEACHMENT
The oath-breakers in Congress
Our elected representatives in the U.S. House and the Senate take the same oath to the Constitution that military officers do. And that is what bothers me so much about those elected officials who blatantly betrayed our Constitution by signing on with the Texas attorney general and his attempt to overthrow our presidential election. Five hundred and sixty-five classmates took that same oath along with me at West Point on June 3, 1964. Twenty-six would subsequently give their lives in combat for our Constitution, as have over 60,000 members of the military since then, all over the globe.
Those in Congress who blatantly ignored their sacred obligation to our Constitution and their oath to support it without reservation should either resign or be removed as a consequence of their betrayal. This includes Reps. Jim Hagedorn and Michelle Fischbach from Minnesota. Over 60,000 unlived lives paid the ultimate price; the 150 or so seditious members of Congress who ignored their oath in an attempt to overthrow a fair election and thus the Constitution should pay the tiny price of losing their jobs.
Robert Carlson, St. Paul
• • •
The letter writers expressing opposition to a Senate impeachment trial on the basis of "be careful what you wish for" arguments were unconvincing. One suggestion was that it would be difficult to find supporters of President Donald Trump who would testify that they had stormed the Capitol because of the president's words. But many of the rioters have already admitted on video that they were involved in the insurrection precisely because "Trump told us to do this." Another bogus argument cited is that an impeachment trial would open the door for a full airing of Trump's claims of election fraud. The truth is that these claims have already had a fair hearing in dozens of courts and have been found to be baseless.