With an insider’s eye, Hot Dish tracks the tastiest bits of Minnesota’s political scene and keep you up-to-date on those elected to serve you.

Contributors in Minnesota: Patrick Condon, Baird Helgeson, Patricia Lopez, Jim Ragsdale, Abby Simons, Rachel E. Stassen-Berger and Glen Stubbe. Contributors in D.C.: Allison Sherry, Corey Mitchell and Jim Spencer.

Senate passes bonding bill

Posted by: under Minnesota legislature Updated: May 11, 2012 - 3:03 PM

The Senate passed at $496 million bonding bill Monday  night, barely changed from the version the House passed earlier in the evening.

The bill passed the Senate by a vote of 45-22. The House passed its version of the bill by a vote of 99-32.earlier Monday afternoon.

A number of senators made an effort to talk their local projects back into the bill – from civic centers to community theaters to a wheelchair softball field – but only two projects made it back in.

The Senate voted to restore a $500,000 project for a flood wall in South Saint Paul and a $2 million renovation for the Harriet Tubman domestic violence shelter in Maplewood. The money for both projects came out of a $50 million pot of money set aside in the bill for economic development grants.

“I think we have a pretty decent bill, from the standpoint of moving Minnesota forward,” said Senate Majority Leader David Senjem, R-Rochester, after five hours of debate and 23 proposed amendments to the bill.

The differences between the House and Senate versions will have to be hammered out in conference committee in a Legislature with only a handful of days left on its calendar.

The capital projects bill will fund bricks-and-mortar projects across the state, from flood mitigation to repairs to the crumbling state Capital. It passed the House Monday by a vote of The final version of the bill includes millions for flood mitigation, bridge and road construction, and repairs to crumbling infrastructure across the state – including $44 million to begin repairs on the aging state Capitol. The bill now heads to the Senate as the House prepares to move on to the next item on its to-do list – the stadium bill.

The half-billion dollar capital-projects bill expanded over the weekend from an earlier total of $496 million. The vote on the bill was delayed last Friday, amid concerns about lopsided funding between the state’s two public higher education systems.

On Friday, the University of Minnesota system was slated to receive $54 million, mostly for maintenance and repair projects around its campuses, while the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system would have gotten $144 million. Over the weekend, negotiators gave the U of M system an extra $10 million and reduced MnSCU funding by $12 million, narrowing the funding gap to $64 million and $132 million respectively.

Other changes over the weekend included restoring $19 million to build an education center at Camp Ripley. The state agency that runs the Minnesota Zoo lost $1 million over the weekend, leaving it with a proposed $4 million for asset preservation – like fixing the leaky dolphin tank. Minneapolis’s Phillips pool stayed in the bill, with $1.75 million earmarked to save the last inner-city pool in the city.

As before, the bill tilts heavily toward bricks-and-mortar projects like flood mitigation and bridge repairs, and leaves out most local projects like convention centers, the Southwest rail corridor, a face-lift for Nicollet Mall or a new ballpark for the St. Paul Saints.

“Let’s not tell Minnesotans that we’re preparing for the future, because we are not,” said Rep. Jean Wagenius, DFL-Minneapolis, lamenting some of the items that were left out of the bonding bill – including funds to fight invasive Asian carp in the rivers and funds for the Southwest light rail corridor.

The bill does contain a $50 million pot of money that can be used for capital project grants – grants that communities might be able to apply for to build, say, a minor league ballpark or a civic center. Rep. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, offered an amendment that would have locked up that $55 million for road construction projects instead, but was voted down.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT