State Rep. Linda Runbeck, R-Circle Pines, the House Property Taxes Division's formidable gavel-wielder and budget hawk, deserves a nod for inspiring the "what if" question I mulled last week:
What if, in 1971, Minnesota had not created local government aid (LGA)?
What if then-Gov. Wendell Anderson and the Legislature's Republican (nee Conservative) majorities had decided to simply shrug at the growing gap between what rich and poor city governments could afford and at the widening difference in property tax bills around the state?
Runbeck fired my thinking with her proposal to strip Minneapolis, St. Paul and Duluth of all LGA by 2015, and take half of it away by 2013 from the older suburbs that receive it, with broad hints of more cuts to follow throughout the state.
And with these words in response to howls of protest by the big cities:
"Sure, they are going to be upset. ... But I argue they built a more costly model of government than had they not had 40 years of subsidy."
She's right, said the former and current mayors I asked to play "what if" with me. Without 40 years of state tax proceeds helping poorer cities pay for cops, firefighters, pothole fillers, librarians, park and rec workers et al., those city governments would be spending less today.
That's because they would be poorer places, the mayors said.