MPLS. Logo

Blog

MPLS.

Breaking news in Minneapolis, right now

Mpls. opts for non-profit recycler over nation's largest waste firm

Above: Equipment operator Marcella Ramirez moved a load of cardboard at Eureka Recycle on Friday, November 15, 2013 (Renee Jones Schneider)

A local non-profit company will soon begin sorting and selling Minneapolis' recyclable materials, after the city opted not to sign a new contract with the nation's largest waste company.

The City Council voted Friday to sign a five-year contract with Minneapolis-based Eureka Recycling to process the plastics, metals, paper and bottles produced by the city's residents. The recycling contract is one of the city's most significant, though sale of the materials has traditionally more than offset the costs of processing.

The city currently works with Texas-based Waste Management, which has a plant in Northeast. Waste Management vied against Eureka for the new contract, spurring environmental groups to highlight Eureka's treatment of workers and committment to reducing waste.

City staff recommended Eureka on financial grounds, however, because the company proposed a lower processing cost and agreed to forego revenues when costs exceed the value of materials.

"There’s obviously some incredibly high expectations in the community and there’s a sense that Eureka can do amazing things," Council Member Cam Gordon said at Friday's City Council meeting. "And can do more than just market and process our recycling, but maybe be a great partner in helping us accomplish our zero waste goals.”

Those financial arrangements are particularly important in today's recycling climate, in which weakened Chinese demand for materials has erased profits cities historically used to keep rates low for consumers.

It remains unclear precisely when Eureka will take over the service. The company also serves St. Paul, which is simultaneously mulling a new contract, as well as Roseville, Lauderdale and some trash haulers who lack their own processing facilities.

Waste Management is the country's largest garbage firm, with facilities spanning from coast to coast. Its opponents in Minneapolis highlighted that the company operates more landfills than recycling facilities -- including several around the state.

The firm has declined to answer questions about its local operations, such as whether it uses temporary labor to sort the materials as claimed by Eureka supporters. Eureka uses full-time employees, who have benefits such as health insurance and sick leave -- the latter of which is a hot topic these days in Minneapolis and St. Paul politics.

Taser favored to win city body cam contract

Minneapolis' plan to outfit police officers with body-worn video cameras appeared to move a step closer to fruition this week.

After months of testing and several delays, the city's IT department has recommended that Taser International be awarded a five-year $4 million contract to outfit hundreds of officers with the pocket-sized recording devices.

Under the pact, which still needs approval from the Ways and Means Committee and the full council, the nation's biggest stun gun maker will supply the department with 587 cameras, docking stations, storage, “additional data access for investigations, replacement program for 300 conducted electrical weapons, and other support equipment such as clips and brackets,” IT officials said.

Advocates see the technology as an important source of physical evidence that will bring clarity to controversial officer-civilian encounters, helping guard against officer misconduct and clearing cops who are falsely accused of wrongdoing. Opponents say the cameras could be an invasion of privacy.

A full department rollout is expected later this year. 

The IT report said:

"After conducting significant internal and external research into customer needs and the body cameras and digital video storage solution, Information Technology (IT) and the MPD are requesting a contract with Taser International."

The city has set aside about $1.1 million for the technology, and has applied for a $600,000 federal grant to help defray costs. 

The department is still fine-tuning its policy for the cameras.

Last fall, the Police Conduct Oversight Commission endorsed a sweeping series of guidelines on the cameras’ use by officers, which were forwarded to Chief Janeé Harteau, who said her department would take the report’s findings under consideration.

Among the report’s key recommendations were: requiring patrol officers to activate their cameras during all service calls, law enforcement activities and any noncriminal encounters with a citizen, as long as they receive consent; and barring officers from editing or viewing body camera footage before writing their incident reports under most circumstances.

Poll: Who's your favorite for 2016 Sportsperson of the Year?

See more polls