If there ever was a time for the Wild to patch its game together and show its "resiliency" (sorry, Dan Myers), it's a three-game homestand that starts tonight at Xcel Energy Center against the San Jose Sharks.
I came oh-so close to using that word in my first question to Bruce Boudreau this morning, but I didn't want him to walk out again by saying, "I'm done."
I wasn't in Winnipeg and yesterday was a day off, so today was our first opportunity to chat with the Wild coach since he ended his postgame press scrum two questions in after the now notorious "resiliency" question.
Here's the deal with the beloved coach: He typically tells it like it is, and he usually isn't in the mood after losses to sugarcoat things and talk about the team's heart or resiliency by not completing a comeback.
He also couldn't care less that the Wild at one point was one of the most consistent teams in the NHL and showed for 60-plus games how good it was. What happened from December-February means squat if the Wild backs into the playoffs and doesn't reach its expectations. He's well aware that this is not the way a team should be playing with the playoffs around the corner. It's why he also today turned back a couple softballs from reporters by saying what happened before means nothing and "to me all that's important is today."
So, when he snapped Sunday night that "You're making it sound like we're good," Boudreau, probably intelligently, ended things right then and there. It's why he also chose not to answer Kevin Gorg's question first.
"When you're emotional, you never know what's going to come out of your mouth," Boudreau said. "I didn't want to say anything stupid. I probably did even in the short time I was there, but I thought it was much more appropriate to leave than to end up doing something dumb."
Now's the time for the Wild to figure this thing out, which columnist Chip Scoggins wrote about today.