I've been a physician for 35 years. During the most recent 25, I've devoted time to practice improvement and population health initiatives. In part, this involved helping individuals to be healthier. It also involved helping the care delivery system explore how to make care more effective, more efficient and more satisfying to patients (the combination labeled "the triple aim").
I encountered the health care system three times recently in ways that made the triple aim feel more urgent.
First, the July 17 Star Tribune had an article ("Lower costs elude hospitals") about the "Pioneer" ACO program in which the federal government is providing financial incentives for health systems delivering care that meets the triple aim. "After the first year of the program, just 13 of the 32 participating health systems were able to lower health care costs," the story reported.
I'll guess that one issue among the systems that did not succeed is that they tweaked existing processes rather than make bolder moves that would actually represent innovation.
Second, a friend recently noticed a breast lump. She went to her doctor, who did an exam and arranged for a mammogram — scheduled for six days out. My friend had a lump that worried her and was told she could wait six days to have a diagnostic test. Same old system.
Someone told my friend of a clinic that had revamped how it diagnoses breast lumps. She made an appointment, had a visit, a mammogram, a biopsy and a treatment plan before she would have had the mammogram at clinic number one. Transformative.
Third, a colleague recently had a CT scan as part of his work-up for a worrisome lung nodule. On the way out of the scan center, his technician told him the doctor would get back to him in a few days with a report. Same old, same old.
I know of centers where the radiologist reads the scan as soon as it is complete and immediately lets the ordering clinician know what it showed. Transformative.