Is a zero-tolerance weapons policy good reason for a school board to use zero discretion? That is the question facing the Anoka-Hennepin school board tonight as it determines the fate of Blaine High School senior Tony Richard.
Richard was suspended from school for 10 days after a box cutter was seen in his car, which was parked in the school's parking lot. He told school administrators that he uses box cutters in his after-school job at Cub Foods, but that wasn't enough to dissuade them from suspending him. Tonight, they will recommend to the school board that he be expelled.
School violence is a growing issue that needs to be taken seriously. But school officials must determine whether a transgression actually posed a threat to students and teachers or was merely a case of forgetfulness. Intent must play a part in the enforcement of a policy so Draconian.
There is no evidence that Richard was a threat to anyone. His record at Blaine, while not spotless, certainly doesn't signal that he posed a danger. He was making no attempt to hide the box cutter; it was in plain view in the cup holder of his car.
No one would argue against the need for a firm weapons policy. But school officials and school board members must not allow the letter of the law to substitute for judgment and discernment.
A reprimand may have been in order, perhaps even a suspension. But before the school board takes an action that can have a long-term effect on the future of a teenager, it should consider whether the step it is about to take is necessary or simply vindictive.
