This is a wondrous time of the year for local sports, with the Twins’ push for a playoff spot at the head of that list. It might not be the exact time when you want to hear about MLB’s ongoing length of game problem, but I started doing some research today on the Twins and now here we are.

The numbers? They’re ugly if you like a more crisply played baseball game (as many of us do).

*Last year, the average nine-inning MLB game took exactly three hours. That’s not good, as it represented a trend in the wrong direction. MLB games had actually gotten six minutes faster between the all-time nine-inning high of 3:02 set in 2014 to the swifter 2:56 of 2015.

*This year, the average game has added five minutes and checks in at 3:05 for a standard nine-inning affair. Barring some sort of barrage of 2 hour games, this year will set a new record for longest average game length. Guess those automatic intentional walks aren’t exactly helping much.

*Twins games, though, are EVEN LONGER than the record-setting MLB pace. The average 9 inning Twins game this season has lasted a shade over 3 hours, 9 minutes. Their last 10 games have all been at least three hours. For the season, they’ve only played 40 games in less than three hours — and 97 have lasted three hours or more (including 93 that finished in 9 innings). Lest you think there are some extra-long outliers that are driving up the average game time, the median — the number right in the middle of the entire 133-game nine-inning set of games for the Twins this year — is also 3 hours, 9 minutes.

*The Twins are 2-17 in their 19 longest games this season. They’re 12-7 in their 19 fastest games this season. Overall, they’re 22-18 in games lasting fewer than three hours, and 49-48 in games 3 hours or longer. I’m not going to read anything into those numbers — a quick explanation is they’ve lost a lot of high-scoring blowout games, and blowouts take longer — but I was curious about it so I looked it up.

*Having attended a nine-inning game Thursday with two small children that lasted 3 hours, 17 minutes, I will say this: games feel a lot longer when you’re watching on TV instead of at the ballpark. I have no idea why that is, but it’s one reason I rarely watch a Twins night game on TV while it’s happening — instead, when I do watch, recording the game and starting it around 9:30 while fast-forwarding through commercials and dead spots in the action.

*And yes, I know duration of games and pace of play are two separate things, but they are also closely related. There’s no reason a baseball game has to last that long — particularly when between 1952 and 1985 the average game time was never 10 minutes higher or lower than 2 hours, 30 minutes, with some ebb and flow along the way.

Older Post

The case for Vikings optimism rests on some dicey assumptions

Newer Post

Wild's Stanley Cup odds reveal tough reality of NHL, Central Division