The U.S. Senate recount spiraled deeper into confusion and bickering Monday, with the campaigns of Sen. Norm Coleman and DFLer Al Franken at odds over how many rejected absentee ballots should be counted and a state Supreme Court deadline to do so looming just four days away.
The impasse clouded what might happen today as the first in a series of meetings across Minnesota, involving local election officials, convene to sort through at least 1,346 absentee ballots -- and maybe hundreds more -- to see which ones may have been improperly rejected in the Nov. 4 election.
A Star Tribune analysis of the origins of 93 percent of those ballots suggests an advantage for Franken.
With the state Canvassing Board holding out the possibility it may certify a winner in the hotly contested race as soon as next Tuesday, and with Franken holding a narrow lead, the absentee ballots may hold the key to the winner of the state's most contentious U.S. Senate race ever.
But by the time the second of two meetings with Deputy Secretary of State Jim Gelbmann ended late Monday afternoon, the campaigns remained far apart. Campaign lawyers held dueling news conferences, accusing the other side of trying to prevent an agreement. And even Gelbmann, who at one point asked lawyers from both campaigns to remain "civil," said a late proposal from Coleman -- to review 654 more votes atop the 1,346 absentee ballots that local officials had already agreed were mistakenly rejected -- threatened to derail the process.
"You're giving the local officials very little time," said Gelbmann, who said the Coleman request presented a "very daunting task."
No agreement on anything
The day's events, which left the Franken campaign accusing Coleman of erecting roadblocks, appeared to lay the groundwork for a future legal challenge should Coleman lose the recount. Coleman's attorneys said Franken, who had previously advocated for counting every legal vote, was now guilty of "hypocrisy" for balking at Coleman's push to review 654 more rejected absentee ballots.