University of Minnesota President Eric Kaler couldn't conclude his opening remarks at the introductory news conference for new athletic director Norwood Teague without addressing the "football issue."
A day earlier, Mary Jo Kane, co-chair of the university's search committee that recommended Teague, acknowledged his résumé includes a "gap in his profile."
Both presumably were pre-emptive moves designed to ease fan anxiety and concerns -- and perhaps even outrage -- over the fact Teague ran an athletic department the past six years that does not field a football team. Naturally, that set off alarm bells and general overreaction, to the degree that some fans probably expected Teague to begin his news conference inside the Gophers football locker room by asking where the free-throw line is.
Alas, he actually looked pretty comfortable in that setting.
"Football is not new to Norwood," Kaler said.
Let's be clear: There's nothing wrong with a little skepticism, and the lack of football administration on Teague's résumé cannot be ignored. College football is too big and too important to just completely dismiss it. And given the program's long, painful history of losing, Gophers fans probably had their hopes set on a "football guy" stepping in to replace Joel Maturi.
A track record in anything is ideal, but the absence of one doesn't automatically disqualify someone from implementing a vision and game plan that gets desired results. Doesn't Teague at least deserve a chance to prove that?
Teague has worked in college athletics for more than two decades, including stints at North Carolina, Arizona State and Virginia. Do you honestly believe he doesn't understand the importance of college football to the overall viability of an athletic department?