For those questioning Judge Brett Kavanaugh's fitness as a justice due to his temperament during his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing: You cannot be serious. He acted exactly the way an innocent person accused of such a horrific act would have. He acted exactly like he should have when Democratic senators were condescending and belittling to him while his family sat behind him listening to these allegations. He acted the way I would expect anyone to act when being personally attacked with allegations so severe they have the potential to not only cost him the position he's been working toward his whole life but also destroy the current life he and his family have already built.
This is not indicative about how a judge would act in any normal case — normal being one that does not directly involve him and his family (which he couldn't be a part of anyway) — and is a total false equivalence. You have the right to be a little angry when your life is being torn apart in front of the entire country. It would have been bizarre and actually more suspicious if he hadn't shown appropriate emotion when being accused of such serious wrongdoings. For everything he has been through, he actually showed a lot of poise and restraint. This is not just about his nomination, it is about his life, his family, his reputation and his entire future — Supreme Court or not — so let's not even try to make his "temperament" in this debacle one of the issues.
Geri Grant, Minnetonka
• • •
Granted, having an unpleasant event in Judge Kavanaugh's early life brought to the public stage is difficult, whether true or untrue, verifiable or not. An emotional response can be expected, but his anger and defiance speaks volumes about character and how he handles difficult issues. I would have expected thoughtful and measured responses to questions, not be lambasted with angry and partisan accusations of a conspiracy. Neither did I need to hear repeated references to his childhood achievements.
Kavanaugh's angry rebuttal to Christine Blasey Ford's testimony, his demeanor and the evasive way he avoided answering questions do not demonstrate the judicial character or comportment we expect and need from members of the nation's highest court.
Llewellyn Hille, Buffalo, Minn.
• • •
Both the positives, his above-reproach behavior toward female classmates and female clerks, etc., and the reported sexual assault could be true. Many middle-aged and older women, if not most, have witnessed inconsistencies in individual men's behavior toward women. When a boy or man is someone who doesn't treat girls and women well, it is almost never all girls and women he treats badly — that is how he gets away with it.
Diane Adair, St. Louis Park
• • •